Accessibility Audit
I audit your site against WCAG 2.2 AA with real screen readers and keyboard-only testing, not just automated scans. You get a prioritized fix list with exact remediation steps for every issue found.
850+ clients served, so the fixes I prescribe are ones I’ve built
Replies within 24 hours, usually the same day
Work delivered for, or alongside, teams at:
What it costs
Automated scanning plus real assistive-technology testing, documented issue by issue. The re-test of your fixes is included, so you finish with a verified result, not just a report.
Want the fixes done for you? Remediation is quoted from the report, item by item.
All prices include GST.
How this runs
Automated tools sweep every template for the machine-findable issues: missing alt text, contrast failures, broken ARIA. It’s the fast half, and only half.
You leave with: the obvious issues logged.
I navigate your real flows keyboard-only and with VoiceOver and NVDA: forms, navigation, checkout. This is where the issues scanners can’t see show up.
You leave with: the barriers real users hit.
Every issue gets a severity, the exact location, and the fix, with legal-risk items flagged at the top. Your developer should never have to ask “but what do I change?”
You leave with: a fix list ready to execute.
After your team ships the fixes, I test the same flows again with the same tools and document the outcome, so you have a record of what was fixed and verified.
You leave with: a verified compliance picture.
I was a teacher before I was a developer, so I test the way a person experiences the site, not the way a bot parses it. A page can pass every scanner and still trap a keyboard user in a modal.
I won’t sell you an overlay widget, and I’ll talk you out of buying one. They don’t fix the underlying issues and they’ve been named in complaints themselves.
Severity in my reports means user impact plus legal risk, in that order. A broken checkout for screen reader users outranks a decorative image without alt text, every time.
— Gaurav
Before you write in
Not answered here? Ask directly and you will hear back within 24 hours.
₹20,000 fixed, and the price includes GST. That covers automated scanning, manual keyboard and screen reader testing against WCAG 2.2 AA, a prioritized issue report with exact fixes, and a re-test after your team ships the changes.
No. Scanners catch contrast, missing alt text, and some structural issues, but they can’t tell that a modal traps keyboard focus or that a screen reader announces your form as meaningless noise. Roughly half the real barriers only show up in manual testing, which is why the audit includes both.
Because AA is the level most laws, courts, and procurement teams reference. Level A alone leaves serious barriers in place, and AAA isn’t realistic for most commercial sites. Testing against 2.2 AA means the result maps to what you’d actually be measured against.
No, and distrust anyone who promises that. What a documented audit and remediation give you is a substantially smaller attack surface and evidence of good-faith effort, which matters in practice. Immunity isn’t a thing anyone can sell.
Yes. The report is written so any competent developer can execute it, but if you’d rather hand it over, I quote the remediation item by item from the report, then run the included re-test to confirm the fixes hold.
About me
Everything I would put on your site is running on mine first.
Care clients get the same stack I trust with my own traffic: GT Performance, Cloudflare, Redis, Hetzner.
I was a teacher before I was a developer. I taught mathematics to competitive-exam students, which is why I explain hard things plainly instead of hiding behind jargon.
What I am actually good at is the join: technical SEO, fast front-ends, and content treated as one system instead of three vendors blaming each other.
Tell me the site and the three journeys that matter most: signup, checkout, contact. I’ll confirm scope, timeline, and the start date.
Replies within 24 hours, usually the same day
