Why Should QA Testers Be Concerned About Technical Debt?

Tech debt is a metaphorical term that states that just like one may end up in debt issues in finances, the software sector also encounters some similar issues which occurs due to the unfinished tasks of past projects and version sprints.

Basically technical debt is the effort required to fix the defects which are present in the code during the time of application release. In simple words, with respect to bugs, it is the difference between what one expects and what gets delivered.

So, when a development team works on an assignment and fixes bugs, unluckily, many more bugs come up. While some bugs are fixed others are delayed for the later time. As this differing problem increases, at one point it gets way too difficult to release the software on time. You can call this the worst consequence of tech debt.

During a common software design and development course, there are several things which can cause technical debt. For instance, insufficient testing, poor documentation, improper bug fixing, inefficient coordination in between teams, delay in refactoring, constant integration absence and other unmanageable factors. Like you can say, they code duplication efforts could cause around 30 to 35% of extra effort.

However, no place understands the challenges of tech debt like the QA testing where the team mates have to standby the unexpected deadlines and everything may appear out of place. Frequently, the testers face the situation of quandaries at the very last minute, when the manager tells the team that the product needs to be rolled out in a week time and that he’s sorry for the delayed communication. Please complete all the test jobs instantly so that the company is ready for the demo!!

Thus, any missed tests or resolve later methodology can cause a tech debt like issue. Big hefty user stories, inefficient test coverage, less sprints and other points of cutting corners because of delivery deadlines plays a big role in the accumulation of tech debt in QA practices.

QA Practices Tech Debt Management

Usually the QA managers witness tech debt as a reasonable verdict of concentrating all the energy on the present sprint solely, which causes accomplishment of test coverage somehow via manual means.

Rather than reacting to the poor results, a proactive approach should be identified to detect the defects after each activity or jobs which can be evaluated. One can handle all of it manually but with thousands of test case situations for a specific project, automated testing is surely a necessity.

Efficient testing could help you get good ground in the tech debt war. So, what does all this mean? It simply means how efficient your system is at acknowledging the defects in the complete application.

Automated testing helps you lower down the number of scripts being implemented by reporting results and making a comparative study with the previously test runs. The procedure being used to run automation is known as automation framework.

Just like credit card debt, tech debt can prove itself to be a chain of companies and basic cause of failure. However, it is not the end of the story. Just like you can opt for best consolidating credit card debt program for your credit card debt, you can opt for a suitable consolidation program for your technical debt.